April 24, 2008

Self Defense In New York

Self defense is a justification defense in New York. PL §35.00 If a justification defense is raised by defense counsel, the defendant does not have the burden to prove at trial that their actions were justified.PL § 25.00 Instead, the prosecution has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s actions were not justified. PL §25.00

In New York, you can use physical force upon a person if you believe it necessary to defend yourself or another individual from what you reasonably believe to be the imminent use of physical force by that person. PL § 35.15 You can be the first to use physical force if you reasonably believe that physical force is about to be inflicted upon you or someone else. [CJI- Justification: Use of Physical Force in Defense of a Person] You need not wait until you are struck or wounded before using physical force to defend yourself or someone else so long as you reasonably believe that another person is about to use physical force upon you or someone else. [CJI- Justification: Use of Physical Force in Defense of a Person] It is irrelevant if you were or may have been mistaken in your beliefs so long as your beliefs were honestly held and were reasonable. [CJI- Justification: Use of Physical Force in Defense of a Person] It would not be considered self defense if you were the initial aggressor unless the other person continued the encounter by the use or threatened use of imminent physical force against you after you had withdrawn from the encounter and had effectively communicated such withdrawal to the other person. PL § 35.15(b)

You would not be justified in using physical force in response to an argument, name calling or the use of bad language absent any physical threats or acts. [CJI- Justification: Use of Physical Force in Defense of a Person] You would not be justified in using physical force if you provoked the other person’s conduct with the intent to cause physical injury to that person. You would also not be justified in using physical force to resist an authorized or unauthorized arrest by a police officer or peace officer. PL § 35.27

A person may not use deadly physical force to defend themselves unless he or she believes that the other person is using or is about to use deadly physical force or if he or she is perfectly able to safely retreat. PL 35.15(2)(a) But, a person does not have to resort to retreating if they are inside their home and are not the initial aggressor.PL 35.15(2)(a)(i) A person also does not have to retreat if he or she is a police or peace officer or is assisting a police offer or peace officer at that officer’s request. PL §35.15(2)(a)(ii) A person also does not need to retreat if they reasonably believe that the person is committing or attempting to commit a kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible criminal sexual act or robbery. PL §35.15(2)(b) A person also does not need to retreat if he or she reasonably believes that the person is committing or attempting to commit a burglary inside a dwelling or occupied building that he or she occupies or controls or is licensed or privileged to be in and deadly force is necessary to prevent or terminate the burglary or attempted burglary. PL §35.15(a)(c) [Please also see: CJI-Justification: Use of Deadly Physical Force in Defense Of A Person]

April 3, 2008

Mistrials in New York Criminal Cases

A New York criminal court judge must declare a mistrial and order a new trial upon a motion by the defense if an error or legal defect occurs in the proceedings during the trial that is prejudicial to the defendant or denies the defendant a fair trial. [CPL § 280.10(1)] A New York criminal court judge must also declare a mistrial and order a new trial at the request of the defendant if there is conduct inside or outside the courtroom that is prejudicial to the defendant or denies the defendant a fair trial. [CPL § 280.10(1)] If there are multiple criminal defendants in the case, the criminal court judge must grant a mistrial only for the defendant who made the motion for a mistrial and for the defendant’s who joined in the motion for a mistrial. [CPL § 280.10(1)] The trial must proceed forward with respect to any defendant who did not make the motion for a mistrial or did not join in the motion for a mistrial. [CPL § 280.10(1)]

A New York criminal court judge must grant a mistrial at the request of the people if the people’s case against the defendant suffers substantial and irreparable prejudice due to the gross misconduct of the defendant or another person acting on behalf of the defendant regardless of whether the misconduct occurs inside or outside the courtroom. [CPL § 280.10(2)] In a case involving multiple defendants, the trial will proceed for any defendant who the people’s case did not suffer substantial and irreparable prejudice due to the gross misconduct and who was not responsible in any way for the gross misconduct. [CPL § 280.10(2)]

If it is physically impossible to proceed with a criminal trial in compliance with the law, the criminal court judge must declare a mistrial and order a new trial upon a motion by either party or upon the court’s own motion. [CPL § 280.10(3)]

March 31, 2008

Decisions of Interest in New York –March 2008

In People v. Azim Hall [Slip Op. No. 2] the New York Court of Appeals in a split decision ruled that the police may perform a visual inspection of an arrestee’s body cavity based upon reasonable suspicion that the arrestee is hiding evidence inside his or her body cavity but if the police see anything suspicious during the visual inspection of the arrestee’s body cavity they then must get a search warrant before removing the suspicious object from the arrestee’s body cavity unless there are exigent circumstances.

451851_coffe_book_session.jpg In People v. Gary White [Slip No. 38] the New York Court of Appeals in a split decision held that under the circumstances of this case post-Miranda statements were not required to be suppressed even though the defendant had been subjected to a period of pre-Miranda custodial interrogation without a pronounced break before the commencement of the post-Miranda interrogation. The circumstances included: the pre-Miranda custodial interrogation lasted no more than five minutes, the defendant first gave an exculpatory alibi after being read the Miranda warnings; the defendant made no incriminating statements before the Miranda warnings were read; there was a fifteen to twenty minute period of small talk followed by the defendant being allowed to smoke a cigarette and drink a soda just before the reading of the Miranda warnings, the defendant freely indicated his willingness to speak; the defendant acknowledged he understood his rights ; and the defendant signed a Miranda card before making any substantive statements.

In People v. Marcos Urbaez, [Slip Op. No. 35], the New York Court of Appeals in a unanimous decision held that the defendant – who convicted of attempted aggravated harassment after a non-jury trial- was not wrongfully stripped of his right to a jury trial when the People on the day of trial and over the objection of the defendant reduced the highest charge from aggravated harassment in the second degree, a class A misdemeanor, down to attempted aggravated harassment in the second degree, a class B misdemeanor.

March 19, 2008

Graffiti Crimes in New York

Graffiti is the etching, painting, covering, drawing upon or otherwise placing a mark upon public or private property with the conscious objective or purpose of damaging such property. [PL §§ 145.60(1) and 15.05(1)]

744628_self_portrait.jpg A person commits the crime of making graffiti in New York if he or she makes graffiti of any kind on any public or private building without the express permission of the owner or operator of the building. [PL §145.60(2)] A person also commits the crime of making graffiti in New York if he or she makes graffiti on any other real or personal property without the express permission of the owner or operator of the subject property. [PL § 145.60(2)] The crime of making graffiti is a class A misdemeanor in New York. [PL §145.60]

A person commits the crime of possession of graffiti instruments if he or she possesses any tool, instrument, substance, solution, or other compound designed or commonly used to make graffiti under circumstances evincing a conscious objective or purpose to use same to damage property without permission or authority to do so. [PL §§145.65 and 15.05(1)] The crime of possession of graffiti instruments is a class B misdemeanor in New York. [PL § 145.65]

March 17, 2008

Gang Assault in the Second Degree in New York

A person commits the crime of gang assault in the second degree in New York if he or she: (1) intends on causing another person physical injury; (2) causes that person or a third person serious physical injury ; and (3) was aided by two or more persons actually present. [PL §120.06]

A person intends on causing another person physical injury if their conscious objective or purpose is to cause physical injury to another. [PL § 15.05(1)] "Physical injury" is defined as impairment of physical condition or substantial pain. [PL §10.10(9)] "Serious physical injury" is defined as physical injury which: creates a substantial risk of death; causes death; causes protracted disfigurement; causes protracted impairment of health; or causes protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ. [PL §10.10(10)] A "person actually present" refers to a person who is ready, willing and able to give instant aid to a person engaged in assaulting another. [CJI-Gang Assault Second Degree]

Gang assault in the second degree is a class C felony in New York.[PL § 120.06]

March 12, 2008

Patronizing a Prostitute in New York

It is a crime in New York to patronize a prostitute. A person patronizes a prostitute in New York if he or she pays pursuant to a prior agreement a fee for having had sex with with another person. [PL§ 230.02(1)(a)] A person also patronizes a prostitute in New York if he or she pays or agrees to a pay fee for another person to have sex with him or her. [PL§ 230.02(1)(b)] A person also patronizes a prostitute in New York if he or she asks another person to have sex with him or her in return for a fee. [PL§ 230.02(1) (c)]

370652_behind_bedroom_doors_i.jpg There are three categories of patronizing a prostitute in New York: patronizing a prostitute in the third degree; patronizing a prostitute in the second degree; and patronizing a prostitute in the first degree. [PL §§ 230.04, 230.05 and 230.06]

A person commits the crime of patronizing a prostitute in the third degree in New York if he or she patronizes a prostitute. [PL §230.04] Patronizing a prostitute in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor. [PL §230.04]

A person commits the crime of patronizing a prostitute in the second degree in New York if he or she is over the age of eighteen and the person being patronized is under the age of fourteen.[PL §230.05] Patronizing a prostitute in the second Degree is a class E felony. [PL §230.05] It is a defense to patronizing a prostitute in the second degree if the person patronizing the prostitute had no reasonable grounds to believe that the person being patronized was less than fourteen years old. [PL§ 230.07]

A person commits the crime of patronizing a prostitute in the first degree in New York if the person being patronized is under the age of eleven. [PL §230.06] Patronizing a prostitute in the first degree is a class D felony. [PL§230.06] It is a defense to patronizing a prostitute in the first degree if the person patronizing the prostitute had no reasonable grounds to believe that the person being patronized was less than eleven years old. [PL §230.07]

The gender of the patron and the prostitute is immaterial. [PL §230.10] Thus, it is not a defense to any charge of patronizing a prostitute that the parties involved were the same gender or that the prostitute was male and the person patronizing the prostitute was female. [PL §230.10(1)(2)]

March 10, 2008

Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree by Knowingly Possessing a Firearm

In New York, a prosecutor must prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt to convict a person of criminal possession of weapon in the fourth degree for having possessed a firearm: 1.The person possessed a firearm, 2.The person did so knowingly; and 3.The firearm was operable. (CJI -Possession of Firearm)


826195_gun4.jpgNew York Penal Law defines a firearm as any pistol or revolver; any shotgun with one or more barrels shorter than eighteen inches; any rifle with one or more barrels shorter than sixteen inches; any rifle or shotgun shorter than twenty- six inches; or any assault weapon. [PL§ 265.00(3)] A list of assault weapons can be found in New York Penal Law §265.00(22).

A person possesses a firearm by having it in their physical possession or by having it under their dominion and control. (CJI -Possession of Firearm) A person knowingly possesses a firearm if they are aware that it is in their possession. (CJI -Possession of Firearm)

A firearm is considered to be operable so long as it is able to fire ammunition. (CJI -Possession of Firearm) It need not be loaded to be considered operable.(CJI -Possession of Firearm)

Criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree is a class A misdemeanor.

February 28, 2008

Recent Criminal Decisions of Interest In New York Criminal Cases- February 2008

People v. Lewis [2008 NY Slip Op 100200]

The Appellate Division Third Department announced that it will no longer follow the line of cases holding that a defendant’s challenge to the validity of a waiver of appeal is unpreserved for appellate review if the defense did not move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction.

Open%20Law%20Book.jpgPeople v. Williams [2008 NY Slip Op 100317]

In a unanimous decision the Appellate Division Third Department affirmed an order of the Supreme Court denying a defendant’s motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 on the ground that the defendant had been found to have committed numerous serious disciplinary infractions while incarcerated. In so doing, the Court chose to follow the First Department’s holding in People v. Paniagua (45 Ad3d at 107-108) and declined to follow the Second Department’s holding in People v. Sanders (936 AD3d 944 [2007])


People v. Stevens [2008 NY Slip Op 01319]

In a unanimous decision, the Appellate Division Second Department affirmed an order of the County Court designating the defendant a level three sex offender having found no merit in the defendant’s argument that the assessment of points against him based upon the victim’s physical helplessness constituted improper “double counting” because he was also assessed points based upon the victim’s age.

.

Continue reading "Recent Criminal Decisions of Interest In New York Criminal Cases- February 2008" »

February 25, 2008

Pre-sentence Reports in New York

The purpose of a pre-sentence report is to assist the court in determining an appropriate sentence for a person convicted of a crime. It is prepared by the probation department between the time the defendant is convicted and the time the defendant is sentenced.

A pre-sentence investigation and report –unless waived- is required in any case where a person has been convicted of a felony. [CPL § 390.20(1)] A pre-sentence investigation and report is also required-unless waived- where a person is convicted of a misdemeanor and the defendant is to be sentenced to more than ninety days in jail; to consecutive sentences totaling more than ninety days in jail; or to a term of probation. [CPL § 390.20(2)] A judge is not required but may order a pre-sentence investigation and report in any other cases. [CPL§390.20(3)]

A presentence report can be waived by the parties and the court where: the sentence is agreed to by the parties and will equal time served; a sentence a probation has been agreed on by the parties and will be imposed; a pre-sentence report has already been done within the last twelve months; or a sentence of probation has been revoked. [CPL § 390.20(4)(a)(i-iv)] A pre-sentence report cannot be waived if a prison sentence is to be imposed. [CPL §390.20390.20(a)] A court may require a victim impact statement even if the presentence investigation and report is waived. [CPL§320.20(4)(b)]

The presentence investigation and report includes gathering and reporting on: the facts and circumstances of the crime; the defendant’s criminal history, the defendant’s social history, the defendant’s employment history, the defendant’s family situation, the defendant’s economic status; the defendant’s educational background, the defendant’s personal habits; any matter the investigating agency deems relevant to sentencing and any other information requested by the court. [CPL §390.30( 1)] Defense counsel can and generally should submit his own pre-sentence memorandum addressing these same topics and may attach statements of others in support of the facts in his memorandum. [CPL § 390.40(1)]

Continue reading "Pre-sentence Reports in New York" »

February 18, 2008

Burglary in New York

There are three categories of burglary in New York: third degree burglary, second degree burglary and first degree burglary.

A person commits burglary in the third degree if he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building with the intent of committing a crime. [PL §140.20] Burglary in the third degree is a class D felony. [PL §140.20]

A person commits burglary in the second degree if he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building with the intent to commit a crime while inside and he or another participant in the crime while entering, inside or fleeing from the building: is armed with explosives or a deadly weapon; causes physical injury to a non-participant in the crime; uses or threatens use of a dangerous instrument; or displays a firearm. [PL§140.25(1)(a)-(d)] A person is also guilty of burglary in the second degree if he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building with the intent to commit a crime and the building is a dwelling. [PL §140.25(2)]Burglary in the second degree is a class C violent felony. [PL§140.25]

657836_forced_entry.jpgA person commits burglary in the first degree if he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling with the intent to commit a crime inside the dwelling and he or another participant in the crime while entering, inside or fleeing from the dwelling: is armed with explosives or a deadly weapon; causes physical injury to a non-participant in the crime; uses or threatens use of a dangerous instrument; or displays what appears to be firearm.[PL§ 140.30(1)-(4) It is an affirmative defense that the firearm was not loaded or not capable of firing a shot capable of causing a serious physical injury. [PL§ 140.30(4)] Burglary in the first degree is a class B violent felony.[PL§140.30]

The statutory definition of “Building” goes beyond its ordinary meaning to include any structure, vehicle or watercraft in which people: stay overnight; conduct business; use as an elementary or secondary school.[PL§ 140.00(2)] "Building" also includes an enclosed motor truck or enclosed motor truck trailer. [PL§ 140.00(2)] Each unit in a multi-unit building is considered a separate building and a part of the main building. [PL§140.00(2)]

Continue reading "Burglary in New York" »

February 18, 2008

The Affirmative Defense of Duress in New York

In New York, it is an affirmative defense if the criminal defendant was forced into committing the alleged crime by the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force upon him or another person. [PL§40.00(20] The force or threatened force must be such that a person of reasonable firmness standing in the defendant’s shoes would not have been able to resist. [PL §40.00(1)] This affirmative defense is called “Duress”.

The defense of duress does not apply if the defendant intentionally or recklessly put himself in a position in which it was probable that he would be subjected to duress. [PL§40.00(2)] Like any New York criminal affirmative defense, the defendant must prove he acted under duress by a preponderance of the evidence. [PL §25.00(2)]

A jury may consider whether the defendant was predisposed to criminal conduct and was not someone whose resolve needed to be overpowered. [CJI2d. Duress] In this regard, the prosecution may be allowed to show that on a separate occasion the defendant: engaged in criminal conduct; was convicted of a crime; or committed some other bad act. [CJI2d.Duress]

Please call me toll free at 1-877-858-2889 if you have been charged with a crime. I am available 24/7. The initial consultation is free. If the case is not dismissed, I will negotiate a plea bargain acceptable to you or take the case to trial.

February 8, 2008

Arson In New York

Arson is covered by New York Penal Law Article 150. There are five categories of arson in New York: fifth degree arson; fourth degree arson; third degree arson; second degree arson and first degree arson. They range from a class A misdemeanor to a class A-I felony. They all involve damage recklessly or intentionally caused to property, buildings or motor vehicles. The definition of buildings goes beyond its ordinary meaning to include any structure, vehicle or watercraft in which people stay overnight or do business. [PL § 150.00] A multi-unit building –such as an office or apartment building -is considered to be a single building. [PL§150.00] Motor vehicles include cars, vans, mobile homes, trucks, motorcycles, etc. Motor vehicles do not include bicycles, electric wheel chairs or snow mobiles. [PL §150.00]

509789_mucho_fuego.jpg A person commits arson in the fifth degree if he or she intentionally damages property of another person without their permission by intentionally starting a fire or causing an explosion. [PL§150.01] Arson in the fifth degree is a class A misdemeanor. [PL§150.01] An adult convicted of arson in the fifth degree may be sentenced to a maximum of one year in the local county jail. [PL§ 70.15(1)] He or she can be sentenced to three years probation. [PL§ 65(3)(b)(ii) He or she can receive a split sentence of up to four months in jail and either three years probation or one year conditional discharge. [PL §60.01(2)(d)] He or she may receive a one year conditional discharge.[PL§§ 60.01(2)(a)(i) and 65.05(3)(a)] He or she could possibly receive a unconditional discharge. [PL§§ 60.01(3)(d) and 65.20(1)] He or she can also be fined a maximum of one thousand dollars. [PL §80.05(1)] He or she also may be ordered to pay restitution or a maximum surcharge of one hundred forty five dollars and a crime victim assistance fee of twenty dollars unless restitution or reparation is made [PL §§ 60.27(1), 60.35(1)(6), and (9)]

A person commits arson in the fourth degree if he or she recklessly causes damage to a building or motor vehicle by intentionally starting a fire or causing an explosion. [PL § §150.05 and 15.05(3)] Arson in the third degree is a class E-Felony. [PL§150.05] An adult first time felony offender convicted of Arson in the fourth degree may receive a maximum indeterminate sentence of 1 1/3 to 4 years in state prison.[PL§70.00(2)(e) and (3)(b)]. He or she may receive a definite sentence of imprisonment of up to one year. [PL 60.0193)(a0 and 70.00(4)] He or she can be sentenced to five years probation. [PL §§60.01(2)(a)(i) and 65.00] He or she may receive a three year conditional discharge. [PL§§ 60.01(2)(a)(i) and 65.05] He or she can receive a split sentence of up to six months in jail and either five years probation or three years of conditional discharge. [PL§60.01(2)(d)] He or she could receive an unconditional discharge. [PL§§ 60.01(3)(d) and 65.20(1)] He or she may be fined up to five thousand dollars. [PL §§60.01(3)(d) and 65.20(1). He or she may be ordered to pay restitution. [PL 60.27(1)] They must pay a mandatory surcharge of two hundred fifty dollars and crime victim assistance fee of twenty dollars unless restitution or reparation is made. [PL 60.35]

Continue reading "Arson In New York" »